What TV does to kids

The most important thing we've learned,
So far as children are concerned,
Is never, NEVER, NEVER, let
Them near your television set
- Or better still, just don't install
The idiotic thing at all.
In almost every house we've been,
We've watched them gaping at the screen.
They loll and slop and lounge about,
And stare until their eyes pop out..
(Last week in someone's place we saw
A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)
They sit and stare and stare and sit
Until they're hypnotized by it,
Until they're absolutely drunk
With all that shocking ghastly junk.
Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,
They don't climb out the window sill,
They never fight or kick or punch,
They leave you free to cook the lunch
And wash the dishes in the sink
- But did you ever stop to think,
To wonder just exactly what
This does to your beloved tot?

IT ROTS THE SENSES IN HIS HEAD!
IT KILLS THE IMAGINATION STONE DEAD!
IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!
IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND.
HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND
A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!
HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!
HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!
HE CANNOT THINK - HE ONLY SEES!

by Roald Dahl, 1964
found in Martin Large's "Set Free Childhood", typed up by Zareen :)

My realtion to Essex University

Sometimes I think Essex University is Hades, somteimes I think I'm on mount Olymp.
Probably I'm schizophrenic.
Or maybe it's only about doing PhD.

Precious advice

"Glaser (especially 1978) ... He recommends reading widely while avoiding the literature most closely related to what you are researching."

"What you do is probably less important than how well you justify it."

Found in http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/grounded.html#a_gt_intro

Economy at the study desk

"...selbst mit den unerfreulichsten Kategorien der Nationalökonomie hantiert sichs am Studiertisch ganz erträglich."

"...even the most unpleasant categories of the National Economy are quite bearable to handle on the study desk."

K. Siegismund

As pessoas e a economia

Esta tabela compara a economia de mercado, a economia planificada socialista e a economia associativa em termos de visão do ser humano, lógica do funcionamento e consequências (clica sobre a tabela para ver melhor). A tabela foi adaptada a partir de Hermannsdorfer, 1990, encontrada em http://www.buschberghof.de/Seiten/Dreiglied.html,

onde também diz que a visão que Adam Smith tinha sobre o ser humano não foi na prática posta em causa desde então:
"Die klassischen Wirtschaftstheorien gehen vom Menschenbild Adam Smith‘s aus, der den moralisierenden Charakter des wirtschaftlichen Eigennutzes beseitigte. Leider bleiben alle Theorien hier stecken... "

Não é o mercado que precisa de ser livre. São as pessoas.

Astrology made more plausible

It seems quite unreasonable to assume that far away stars that have no connection between them, but that seen from the earth reminded old Greek fellows of some mythical figures, influence our personality. Of course, everything is connected and so there could be an influence, though, how it works would be impossible to be explained.

However, where old Greek fellows saw Capricorn rising in the end of December, today there is not Capricorn rising anymore, because of all the movements of the Earth, the solar system, the Galax (I didn't grasp the Physics of that part), the constellations now rise almost one month later than they did 2000 years ago.

So if someone has Capricorn as its sun sign, actually the constellation in the night sky when he was born was not Capricorn.

Does this mean astrology is fake and we should burry it immediately and forever?

No. In fact, what matters is not at all the constellation rising at the time of your birth, but the position that the Earth has in relation to the Sun. The Earth moves around the Sun in one year, and that circle of 360' has been divided into 12 equal parts to which the symbols of the constellations have been attributed some 2000 years ago.

Now, the influence of the position of the Earth around the Sun is obvious, as it is revealed in the seasons. But it has also other influences, for example, on crystallization processes, as Lilly Kolisko has shown in the early 20th century.

But wouldn't it be boring to say, I was born at 274', instead of saying "I'm Pisces" or so? Though, that would certainly suit our modern mathematical and materialistic minds much more.

Why the time of birth should imprint personality traits upon us nevertheless remains enigmatic. Hum, I start to guess that it is not time of birth that really matters...

Planmaessig

"Ja, mach nur einen Plan,
sei nur ein großes Licht!
Und mach dann noch 'nen zweiten Plan,
geh’n tun sie beide nicht."